Thursday, 10 December 2009

Third pre-delivery inspection

I had my third PDI yesterday. Officially it's called a personal development interview, but given the letters are the same as the letter for a pre-delivery inspection on a new car, my hubbie (and now I) refer to it as such. In some ways, I suppose it is - a mental inspection before the local review. But, that's neither here nor there...

The interviewer was the same as my last 2 PDIs. So at least I knew the person I was going to see, if not the questions he'd put to me. Firstly he asked why I'd had an extension on my placement.

I told him it was as I'd not had a chance to look at some aspects of ministry and to show my last assessor how I'd learnt from various issues which had come to light at my last placement. Given my current placement is a full 6 month one and at a new place, it has been being treated by my new assessor as a clean slate, so to speak.

My PDI interviewer asked how I dealt with criticism. I gave an example which he said could be regarded more as my assessor teaching me. Although that is partly true, I told the PDI interviewer how I view all feedback - either positive or negative - as criticism. I listen to it and, most of the time, use that feedback for the next time I'm in a similar situation. If there's something which has been pointed out to me that I don't agree with the other person's stand point I'll explain why I've done something a certain way. I'm not sure ff that was the answer either ministries council, my local review team etc will like, but it was honest.

My interviewer asked how I dealt with conflict. Unfortunately, that hasn't been something I've had to deal with in my current placement and I recall was something which my last local review stated I needed to look at. I did say I've had situations at work where a group of my colleagues have been discussing a big news item. Although I agreed the crime was appalling I thought the full condemnation of the criminal was excessive. I suggested to my colleagues to think about possibly why the criminal would be like that. My interviewer liked the idea of me using the example of getting people to look at situations from others' prospectives.

I was also asked what style of decision making I would have in ministry. Autocratic of democratic? Democratic. Getting as many people, from the congregation (and wider community), as possible on board strikes me as the best way to go. I did say I was aware sometimes I would have to make decision which may be unpopular with everyone. That said, I would still try to get as many people as possible on board and, hopefully, they would see why the difficult decision had to be made.

So, I wait to see what my latest PDI report says. Perhaps I'm being negative, but I don't think it's going to be as favourable as my last one! Oh well, if God's really calling me, I'll get exactly what I need.

3 comments:

  1. I could never judge how these things went. Wait and see what the report says and use it as a development tool. Discuss your experience with your supervisor to flag up any issues. What they are looking for is growth and openess to learning.

    Good luck!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yep, what CB says.
    In a sense they are looking for potential, but also movement towards that. The other key thing in W&S is leadership and your potential to lead effectively.
    The potentially useful outcome of any concerns flagged up at local review and its associated reports is that it gives you something very specific to address at assessment conference. This means that you are less likely to be led off down an avenue of questioning that you perhaps haven't been as well prepared for.
    As for the 'criticism' thing - maybe it's simply an issue of 'spin'. Criticism has very negative connotations. 'Teaching opportunities' sounds so much better, does it not? ;~)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Guys

    Thanks for the omments. CB, you're right, I need to wait and see. I recall I thought my report would be not great last time and it was pretty positive.

    John - teaching operunities does sound so much better, but I'm used to the word criticism from work development, so it probably doesn't has as many negative overtones to me as a lot of people. Talking about selection conference is slightly jumping the gun, though ;-)

    Thanks again for the suppor, though, guys.
    Mrs G

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for taking the time to comment, even if just to say "Hi".
I do moderate my comments, but don't let that put you off. Go on, you know you want to!